FAILURE TO DISCLOSE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR PREFERRED FAMILY MUTUAL FUNDS
by Lawrence C. Melton, Esq., lmelton@dhayeslaw.com
THE HAYES LAW FIRM, www.dhayeslaw.com
Reuters has reported that Edward Jones has agreed to pay $75 million to settle charges related to its preferred mutual fund family program. (Karey Wutkowski, Edward Jones to pay $75 million in SEC settlement, Reuters, July 13, 2007).
http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleID=USN1327980920070713
Specifically, the SEC said Edward Jones did not adequately disclose its financial incentives to sell mutual funds from the preferred families of mutual funds. (Karey Wutkowski, Edward Jones to pay $75 million in SEC settlement, Reuters, July 13, 2007).
During an interview last month, Debra Hayes of The Hayes Law Firm made the following comments about Edward Jones:
"Edward Jones is in the middle of a class action settlement for taking kickbacks from the mutual funds. When you walked into Edward Jones, there were eight mutual funds and every single client I've ever had has had one of those same eight mutual funds. Well, that's because Edward Jones was getting kickbacks on those mutual funds."
See Interview with Debra Hayes Part II, ABOUT BROKER FRAUD BLOG, June 15, 2007.
All too often the broker will fail to disclose his incentive for investing in preferred family mutual funds, namely that they receive what amounts to a "kickback". “The duty of fair disclosure applies to the broker’s commissions and other compensation where the nondisclosure may be material to the customer’s decision to purchase the security the broker has recommended.” NASD Enforcement v. Josephthal & Co., Inc., 2001 WL 1886873 (May 15, 2001). The failure to disclose such incentives deprives the customer.
As I stated in yesterday's blog, the customer has a right to know whether his registered representative is recommending a security based upon the registered representative’s own financial interest rather that the investment value of the recommended security. Misrepresenting or omitting to disclose a broker’s financial or economic incentive in connection with a stock recommendation constitutes a violation of the antifraud provisions. Indeed, “the SEC has established, through its enforcement actions, the principle that charging undisclosed excessive commissions constitutes fraud.” Ettinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 835 F.2d 1031, 1033 (3d Cir. 1987).
The Hayes Law Firm is an experienced and efficient plaintiff's firm that specializes in securities arbitration and securities litigation all across the country. Pleas visit our web page at: www.dhayeslaw.com. Our toll free phone number is 1-866-332-3567.
<a href="http://www.blogtopsites.com/law/"><img style="border:none;" src="http://www.blogtopsites.com/track_52282.gif" alt="Law Blogs - Blog Top Sites" /></a>
<a href="http://www.blogrankings.com" title="Blogrankings.com a directory of blog sites"><strong>BlogRankings.com</strong></a>
<a
href="http://www.getblogs.com" title="Find Blogs in the Blog
Directory"><img
src="http://www.getblogs.com/getblogs8.gif" alt="Find Blogs in the Blog
Directory"></a>
<a href="http://www.weblogalot.com/" target="_blank" title="Free Weblog Directory">Free Weblog Directory</a>
Comments